New Bush Telegraph Independent Stories since 1987
COMMUNITYSUSTAINABILITYENVIRONMENTPOLITICSCOUNCILARTSCLIMATE CHANGE

Burrill Lake residents say "No!" to Over-Development

July 13, 2020

Residents of Burrill Lake have united to oppose plans to upgrade the Edgewater Motel, and are deeply concerned about the adverse impacts this 12.8-metre-high development will have on the environment, liveability, and character of their coastal village.

In June, Community Group Keep Burrill Beautiful brought together over 100 concerned residents, rallying to voice their opposition to the current plans. They state that the motel size should be scaled back with a better design, and, are in no way anti-development. 

Town planning consultants studied the Edgewater Motel Development with six points of concern being forwarded to Shoalhaven City Council, echoing the voices of the community. It addressed possibilities of non-compliance and insufficient information regarding the SEPP Coastal Management Plan (2018), hydraulic impact, environmental damage, marine habitat, issues surrounding public access, noise, use of public land and proposed building size.

The proposed site, classed as a ‘high hazard development on flood prone land’, under Chapter G9 of the Development Control Plan states, that there should be no ‘intensification of project’, bringing higher importance to accuracy in hydraulic modelling reports, recognising with construction other properties may also be affected. 

Accuracy and transparency of environmental reports on impact to coastline, coastal saltmarsh, and marine habitat have also been requested. 

With plans seeing a rooftop bar operate until midnight daily, and being directly adjacent to the tourist park, concerns are of sound travelling further distances over water. Residents questioned current plans of extensions being erected over the reeds and lake, with access to the foreshore and beach being controlled by motel gates. 

Developments on a large scale, such as the multi-storey Edgewater Motel, places stress on coastal village infrastructure, services, and amenities. In this instance, parking spaces of 75 are required for this proposal, but only 52 are planned. Parking is at a premium for this area for people to access the beach, tourist park, and camping areas. Another example of why this planned development is too large to suit the proposed site. 

This is not the first over-development battle for Burrill Lake. In 2006, a previous Land and Environment Court case approved a 15.9m high motel in the same vicinity. This did not proceed, instead, the land was purchased by RMS for construction of the highway and bridge. 

Previous 2006 Motel design. Photo: Keep Burrill beautiful

The risk of development like this, and Moona Street in Huskisson, set the precedent for similar developments being built on the foreshore of coastal villages. Tourists visit the area for its unspoilt nature – the ‘Unspoilt Shoalhaven’. All planning should endeavour to maintain this character. Better planning decisions need to start here, don’t let it be a case of regret once it’s gone.

If you liked this article help us to plant trees in its honour. The New Bush Telegraph practices community journalism and plants a tree for every article published, although we hope to plant a whole lot more trees than just one. You can contribute as little as $5. 

FIND OUT MORE / DONATE

This article is in the following category/ies:

  • Categories

  • Archives

    3 comments on “Burrill Lake residents say "No!" to Over-Development”

    1. I am so tired of overdevelopment. The south coast is very quickly losing its pristine habitats and original beach shacks just so a few developers mostly not local can earn big money. My family have lived in Vincentia for 4 generations and witnessed many special places destroyed. Vincentia swamp lands and now Moona creek. It is frightening to think of the area turning into the Gold coast. I hope this does not happen.

    2. Having just read extraordinary The Overstory, I am ever more concerned about developments like these. I hope the Council - those members who are not interested in preserving what is left of our overdeveloped world -will listen to concerned citizens.

    3. With the Council elections coming up and all the destruction from the bushfires fresh on peoples mind, it is good that Brad is bringing up issues of ongoing development. It is going to be one of the major campaign issues. I am a resident of the south coast, further north, and I am deeply concerned for my community as well. There has been rampant greed and vested interest pushing development down here for too long. We need people in the council truly representing our communities not the conservative forces that have outvoted any attempts at enlightened and environmental development. The electorate needs to start rethinking who
      they want in office.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.

    Archives

    Privacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
    Copyright © New Bush Telegraph Incorporated ABN: 42106732072
    linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram